im not sure about the difference between them, but pack animals could increase OR decrease your campaign speed based on whether or not you need them. obviously if you're way over your carrying capacity, you need more pack animals! but if you're way under, you'll start to receive a "Herd" penalty to your movement speed, as discussed here. Mount and Blade is more gamey, it's not as historically accurate, it's generally more vague but it will afford a lot more replayability than Kingdom Come which revolves around the storyline. Kingdom Come is about progressing through the story, Mount and Blade is about the experience. 2. Renn_Hoek. the game never was a reskinned warband, there were and are way too many differences for that, that it is and feels similar to warband is to be expected, this is a mount & blade game after all so it has to be. is it better than warband though? for me personally and for many other yes, defenitely, on the other hand for many others no, defenitely not. no pack animal don't do that only riding horses do. the two animal that increase capacity like mule and sumpter horses don't increase your movement speed passively. Good point, you are right (not that I mentioned pack horses specifically). But the point stands: just collect all the horses you can, Sumpter and mules for cargo, warhorses and the Now, comparing the Warband and Bannerlord maps; don’t even bother. Some cities have completely been moved around, the map is quadruple the size, seas and peninsulas have been placed and the Empire lore has been added, declaring it the main quest line of the game. What is interesting however that some city names such as Ocs Hall became Uxkhal That seems pretty silly. Probably better just to consider the old Warband map more geographically compressed. 88. yaccub. 1.9K votes, 277 comments. 265K subscribers in the mountandblade community. A subreddit and community for the Mount & Blade series, created by…. hGpN16s. Shadow Type: Okay, there are two settings that make a massive difference in Mount & Blade 2, and this is the only one that doesn't affect the game itself. Mount & Blade 2 includes three different Warband has only Sandbox mode, where VC has both Story mode and Sandbox. VC is great, but the gameplay is totally different than the Warband. Horses play a very small role in VC and ranged weapons are weak. On the other hand battles on foot and thrown weapons are what the game is all about. I like VC, but the gameplay is not one I really would Mount and Blade is more gamey, it's not as historically accurate, it's generally more vague but it will afford a lot more replayability than Kingdom Come which revolves around the storyline. Kingdom Come is about progressing through the story, Mount and Blade is about the experience. 2. Renn_Hoek. In warband everyone was immediately pissed for having a female character and it was a lot more immersive and challenging. In bannerlord though nobody's said anything and 50% of AI lords are female. I loved playing female characters in warband because of it but it'll be disappointing if it doesn't have much, if any, impact here. Thanks! I think Digital Deluxe will include Digital Story Companion which is released just now. #1. Apple Taco Dec 16, 2022 @ 10:55am. Update: looks like they just posted the full details lol. Move along :v. and thanks Vertibird! #2. Vertibird Dec 16, 2022 @ 10:57am. the game never was a reskinned warband, there were and are way too many differences for that, that it is and feels similar to warband is to be expected, this is a mount & blade game after all so it has to be. is it better than warband though? for me personally and for many other yes, defenitely, on the other hand for many others no, defenitely not.

mount and blade bannerlord differences